[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220221084937.167743369@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 069/227] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use noinstr in favor of notrace
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
[ Upstream commit dcb85f85fa6f142aae1fe86f399d4503d49f2b60 ]
While the stackleak plugin was already using notrace, objtool is now a
bit more picky. Update the notrace uses to noinstr. Silences the
following objtool warnings when building with:
CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY=y
CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y
CONFIG_VMLINUX_VALIDATION=y
CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=y
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_syscall_64()+0x9: call to stackleak_track_stack() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_int80_syscall_32()+0x9: call to stackleak_track_stack() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exc_general_protection()+0x22: call to stackleak_track_stack() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: fixup_bad_iret()+0x20: call to stackleak_track_stack() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_machine_check()+0x27: call to stackleak_track_stack() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x5346e: call to stackleak_erase() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .entry.text+0x143: call to stackleak_erase() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .entry.text+0x10eb: call to stackleak_erase() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .entry.text+0x17f9: call to stackleak_erase() leaves .noinstr.text section
Note that the plugin's addition of calls to stackleak_track_stack() from
noinstr functions is expected to be safe, as it isn't runtime
instrumentation and is self-contained.
Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/stackleak.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stackleak.c b/kernel/stackleak.c
index ce161a8e8d975..dd07239ddff9f 100644
--- a/kernel/stackleak.c
+++ b/kernel/stackleak.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int stack_erasing_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
#define skip_erasing() false
#endif /* CONFIG_STACKLEAK_RUNTIME_DISABLE */
-asmlinkage void notrace stackleak_erase(void)
+asmlinkage void noinstr stackleak_erase(void)
{
/* It would be nice not to have 'kstack_ptr' and 'boundary' on stack */
unsigned long kstack_ptr = current->lowest_stack;
@@ -102,9 +102,8 @@ asmlinkage void notrace stackleak_erase(void)
/* Reset the 'lowest_stack' value for the next syscall */
current->lowest_stack = current_top_of_stack() - THREAD_SIZE/64;
}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(stackleak_erase);
-void __used __no_caller_saved_registers notrace stackleak_track_stack(void)
+void __used __no_caller_saved_registers noinstr stackleak_track_stack(void)
{
unsigned long sp = current_stack_pointer;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists