[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220221084916.955104533@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:49:22 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 42/80] bonding: force carrier update when releasing slave
From: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>
commit a6ab75cec1e461f8a35559054c146c21428430b8 upstream.
In __bond_release_one(), bond_set_carrier() is only called when bond
device has no slave. Therefore, if we remove the up slave from a master
with two slaves and keep the down slave, the master will remain up.
Fix this by moving bond_set_carrier() out of if (!bond_has_slaves(bond))
statement.
Reproducer:
$ insmod bonding.ko mode=0 miimon=100 max_bonds=2
$ ifconfig bond0 up
$ ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1
$ ifconfig eth0 down
$ ifenslave -d bond0 eth1
$ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Fixes: ff59c4563a8d ("[PATCH] bonding: support carrier state for master")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1645021088-38370-1-git-send-email-zhangchangzhong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1979,10 +1979,9 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
}
- if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
- bond_set_carrier(bond);
+ bond_set_carrier(bond);
+ if (!bond_has_slaves(bond))
eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
- }
unblock_netpoll_tx();
synchronize_rcu();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists