linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 04/10] linux/kernel: introduce lower_48

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:56:13 -0800
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, colyli@...e.de,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 04/10] linux/kernel: introduce lower_48_bits macro

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 05:50:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:45:53AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 08:31 -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * lower_48_bits - return bits 0-47 of a number
> > > + * @n: the number we're accessing
> > > + */
> > > +#define lower_48_bits(n) ((u64)((n) & 0xffffffffffffull))
> > 
> > why not make this a static inline function?
> 
> Agreed.

Sure, that sounds good to me. I only did it this way to match the
existing local convention, but I personally prefer the inline function
too.