[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbQ9U22afR74YiZs95qCm7dnLb2k4_nT3Le__hJPpDGUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:44:54 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Properly undo autosuspend
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:19 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> The PM Runtime docs say:
> Drivers in ->remove() callback should undo the runtime PM changes done
> in ->probe(). Usually this means calling pm_runtime_disable(),
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() etc.
>
> We weren't doing that for autosuspend. Let's do it.
>
> Fixes: 9bede63127c6 ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use pm_runtime autosuspend")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Hm. I know a few places in drivers where I don't do this :/
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists