[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220222035648.17984-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:56:48 +0800
From: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vt_ioctl: fix potential spectre v1 in VT_DISALLOCATE
In VT_ACTIVATE an almost identical code path has been patched
with array_index_nospec. In the VT_DISALLOCATE path, the arg is
the user input from a system call argument and lately used as a index
for vc_cons[index].d access, which can be reached through path like
vt_disallocate->vc_busy or vt_disallocate->vc_deallocate.
For consistency both code paths should have the same mitigations
applied.
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>
---
drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
index 580136986..acd53c1c9 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -898,10 +898,13 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
if (arg > MAX_NR_CONSOLES)
return -ENXIO;
- if (arg == 0)
+ if (arg == 0) {
vt_disallocate_all();
- else
- return vt_disallocate(--arg);
+ } else {
+ --arg;
+ arg = array_index_nospec(arg, MAX_NR_CONSOLES);
+ return vt_disallocate(arg);
+ }
break;
case VT_RESIZE:
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists