[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e883ccb5-68ea-f802-e4fd-864672d8ad7b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:51:39 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, richard.genoud@...il.com,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, lukas@...ner.de,
p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] serial: core: move RS485 configuration tasks from
drivers into core
On 22. 02. 22, 2:14, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> Several drivers that support setting the RS485 configuration via userspace
> implement one or more of the following tasks:
>
> - in case of an invalid RTS configuration (both RTS after send and RTS on
> send set or both unset) fall back to enable RTS on send and disable RTS
> after send
>
> - nullify the padding field of the returned serial_rs485 struct
>
> - copy the configuration into the uart port struct
>
> - limit RTS delays to 100 ms
>
> Move these tasks into the serial core to make them generic and to provide
> a consistent behaviour among all drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index 846192a7b4bf..2b3afe038c1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ static struct lock_class_key port_lock_key;
>
> #define HIGH_BITS_OFFSET ((sizeof(long)-sizeof(int))*8)
>
> +/*
> + * Max time with active RTS before/after data is sent.
> + */
> +#define RS485_MAX_RTS_DELAY 100 /* msecs */
> +
> static void uart_change_speed(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state,
> struct ktermios *old_termios);
> static void uart_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct *tty, int timeout);
> @@ -1282,8 +1287,32 @@ static int uart_set_rs485_config(struct uart_port *port,
> if (copy_from_user(&rs485, rs485_user, sizeof(*rs485_user)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + /* pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
> + if (!(rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
> + !(rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) {
> + pr_warn("invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n");
Can't we have a device prefix here, so that everyone knows what device
is affected? Without that, it's not that useful. At least port->name &
port->line could be printed. The uart core uses dev_* prints, but prints
also line as uport->dev can be NULL sometimes.
Hm, we could introduce uart_print family (to print something like what
is in uart_report_port).
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists