linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/32] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: unify function names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <338bfd692a372450d1210a333994c31e@walle.cc>
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:26:15 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        yaliang.wang@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/32] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: unify function names

Am 2022-02-22 08:23, schrieb Pratyush Yadav:
> On 21/02/22 01:07PM, Michael Walle wrote:
>> To avoid name clashes unify all the function and static object names 
>> and
>> use one of the following prefixes which should be sufficiently unique:
>>  - <vendor>_nor_
>>  - <flash_family>_nor_
>>  - <flash_part>_
> 
> Shouldn't this be "<flash_part>_nor_"?

No, a part name is already unique and its the same "style" as spi nand
is doing it.

-michael