linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/slab: Do not call kmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:10:32 +0000
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/slab: Do not call kmalloc_large() for unsupported
 size

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:53:39PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:53:34AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > SLAB's kfree() does not support freeing an object that is allocated from
> > kmalloc_large(). Fix this as SLAB do not pass requests larger than
> > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE directly to page allocator.
> 
> I was wondering if we wanted to go in the other direction and get rid of
> kmalloc cache sizes larger than, say, 64kB from the SLAB allocator.

Good point.

Hmm.. I don't think SLAB is benefiting from queueing that large objects,
and maximum size is still limited to what buddy allocator supports.

I'll try reducing kmalloc caches up to order-1 page like SLUB.
That would be easier to maintain.

Thanks,
Hyeonggon