lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YhSwhdr96qnka4yx@intel.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:44:37 +0200 From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@...el.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/i915: Separate wakeref tracking On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:28:33AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > On 22.02.2022 08:12, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:25:39AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> -static noinline depot_stack_handle_t > >> +static intel_wakeref_t > >> track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm) > >> { > >> - depot_stack_handle_t stack, *stacks; > >> - unsigned long flags; > >> - > >> - if (rpm->no_wakeref_tracking) > >> - return -1; > >> - > >> - stack = __save_depot_stack(); > >> - if (!stack) > >> + if (!rpm->available) > >> return -1; > > Still not the same. > > > > It was fixed but in wrong place - patch 11. I will move the change here. Doesn't look correct there either. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists