[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220222095328.7962-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:53:28 +0000
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@...u.ac.kr>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
amit@...nel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, corbet@....net,
david@...hat.com, dwmw@...zon.com, elver@...gle.com,
foersleo@...zon.de, gthelen@...gle.com, markubo@...zon.de,
rientjes@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-damon@...zon.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] mm/damon/core: Add damon_start_one()
Hello Jonghyeon,
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:26:10 +0900 Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@...u.ac.kr> wrote:
> damon_start() function is designed to start multiple damon monitoring
> contexts. But, sometimes we need to start monitoring one context.
> Although __damon_start() could be considered to start for one monitoring
> context, it seems reasonable to adopt a new function that does not need
> to handle 'damon_lock' from the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@...u.ac.kr>
> ---
> include/linux/damon.h | 1 +
> mm/damon/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index c0adf1566603..069577477662 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ int damon_register_ops(struct damon_operations *ops);
> int damon_select_ops(struct damon_ctx *ctx, enum damon_ops_id id);
>
> int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs);
> +int damon_start_one(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> int damon_stop(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_DAMON */
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 290c9c0535ee..e43f138a3489 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,31 @@ int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs)
> return err;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * damon_start_one() - Starts the monitorings for one context.
> + * @ctx: monitoring context
> + *
> + * This function starts one monitoring thread for only one monitoring context
> + * handling damon_lock.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int damon_start_one(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&damon_lock);
> + err = __damon_start(ctx);
> + if (err) {
> + mutex_unlock(&damon_lock);
> + return err;
> + }
> + nr_running_ctxs++;
> + mutex_unlock(&damon_lock);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
IMHO, this looks like an unnecessary duplication of code. Unless this is
needed for a real usecase, this change might unnecessarily make the code only a
little bit more complicated. And to my understanding of the next patch, this
is not really needed for this patchset. I will left comments on the patch. If
I'm missing something, please clarify why this is really needed.
Furthermore, damon_start() starts a set of DAMON contexts in exclusive manner,
to ensure there will be no interference. This patch breaks the assumption.
That is, contexts that started with damon_start() could be interfered by other
contexts that started with damon_start_one(). I have a plan to make
damon_start() also work for non-exclusive contexts group[1], though.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220217161938.8874-3-sj@kernel.org/
Thanks,
SJ
> /*
> * __damon_stop() - Stops monitoring of given context.
> * @ctx: monitoring context
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists