[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220222104054.70286-1-flyingpeng@tencent.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:40:54 +0800
From: Peng Hao <flyingpenghao@...il.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM:nVMX: Make setup/unsetup under the same conditions
From: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
Make sure nested_vmx_hardware_setup/unsetup() are called in pairs under
the same conditions. Calling nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() when nested
is false "works" right now because it only calls free_page() on zero-
initialized pointers, but it's possible that more code will be added to
nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() in the future.
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 75ed7d6f35cc..9fad3c73395a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7852,7 +7852,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
vmx_set_cpu_caps();
r = alloc_kvm_area();
- if (r)
+ if (r && nested)
nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup();
kvm_set_posted_intr_wakeup_handler(pi_wakeup_handler);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists