[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhRAOQbH15E7y9s8@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:45:29 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhe@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
keescook@...omium.org, kernel@...ccoli.net,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] panic: Move panic_print before kmsg dumpers
On (22/02/14 11:13), Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> -static void panic_print_sys_info(void)
> +static void panic_print_sys_info(bool console_flush)
> {
> - if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG)
> - console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_REPLAY_ALL);
> + if (console_flush) {
> + if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG)
> + console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_REPLAY_ALL);
> + return;
> + }
Yeah, if Petr is fine with that then I'm OK. But at the same time,
we have `panic_print' which is a bit mask of what panic_print_sys_info()
should do. And now we also have a boolean `console_flush` flag that tells
panic_print_sys_info() to ignore some (one as of now) bits of `panic_print'.
So _maybe_ panic_print_sys_info() can just accept panic_print as
its parameter and then we can do something like this (as an example)
panic_print_sys_info(panic_print & ~PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG);
> if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT)
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace();
> @@ -286,6 +289,8 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
> */
> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
[..]
> + panic_print_sys_info(false);
Merely because `panic_print_sys_info(false);` doesn't tell much to a reader.
Like what is print sys info false?
Or did you already discuss this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists