[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7d8cff4-b84e-1b73-1d54-2e221b90dac1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:06:28 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <helgaas@...nel.org>,
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
<mike.leach@...aro.org>, <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
<joro@...tes.org>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
<robin.murphy@....com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<acme@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<coresight@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
CC: <prime.zeng@...wei.com>, <liuqi115@...wei.com>,
<zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
<song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] hwtracing: Add trace function support for
HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace device
On 21/02/2022 08:43, Yicong Yang wrote:
> HiSilicon PCIe tune and trace device(PTT) is a PCIe Root Complex
> integrated Endpoint(RCiEP) device, providing the capability
> to dynamically monitor and tune the PCIe traffic, and trace
> the TLP headers.
>
> Add the driver for the device to enable the trace function.
> This patch adds basic function of trace, including the device's
> probe and initialization, functions for trace buffer allocation
> and trace enable/disable, register an interrupt handler to
> simply response to the DMA events. The user interface of trace
> will be added in the following patch.
>
Fill commit message lines upto 75 characters
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
> ---
> drivers/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/hwtracing/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.c | 370 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.h | 149 +++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 535 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
> index a110338c860c..ab3411e4eba5 100644
> --- a/drivers/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_USB4) += thunderbolt/
> obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT) += hwtracing/coresight/
> obj-y += hwtracing/intel_th/
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM) += hwtracing/stm/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_PTT) += hwtracing/ptt/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID) += android/
> obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM) += nvmem/
> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA) += fpga/
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/Kconfig
> index 13085835a636..911ee977103c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/Kconfig
> @@ -5,4 +5,6 @@ source "drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig"
>
> source "drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/Kconfig"
>
> +source "drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Kconfig"
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..41fa83921a07
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +config HISI_PTT
> + tristate "HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace Device"
> + depends on ARM64 && PCI && HAS_DMA && HAS_IOMEM
why no compile test support?
> + help
> + HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace Device exists as a PCIe RCiEP
> + device, and it provides support for PCIe traffic tuning and
> + tracing TLP headers to the memory.
> +
> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> + will be called hisi_ptt.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..908c09a98161
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_PTT) += hisi_ptt.o
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.c b/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a5b4f09ccd1e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/ptt/hisi_ptt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,370 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Driver for HiSilicon PCIe tune and trace device
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd.
> + * Author: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +
> +#include "hisi_ptt.h"
> +
> +static u16 hisi_ptt_get_filter_val(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> + return BIT(HISI_PCIE_CORE_PORT_ID(PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn)));
> +
> + return PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_ptt_wait_trace_hw_idle(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + return readl_poll_timeout_atomic(hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_STS,
> + val, val & HISI_PTT_TRACE_IDLE,
> + HISI_PTT_WAIT_POLL_INTERVAL_US,
> + HISI_PTT_WAIT_TIMEOUT_US);
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_ptt_wait_dma_reset_done(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + return readl_poll_timeout_atomic(hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_WR_STS,
> + val, !val, HISI_PTT_RESET_POLL_INTERVAL_US,
> + HISI_PTT_RESET_TIMEOUT_US);
> +}
> +
> +static void hisi_ptt_free_trace_buf(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> + struct hisi_ptt_trace_ctrl *ctrl = &hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl;
> + struct device *dev = &hisi_ptt->pdev->dev;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!ctrl->trace_buf)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_CNT; i++)
it's good practice to use {} for if-else or similar in the loop
> + if (ctrl->trace_buf[i].addr)
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_SIZE,
> + ctrl->trace_buf[i].addr,
> + ctrl->trace_buf[i].dma);
> +
> + kfree(ctrl->trace_buf);
> + ctrl->trace_buf = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_ptt_alloc_trace_buf(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> + struct hisi_ptt_trace_ctrl *ctrl = &hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl;
> + struct device *dev = &hisi_ptt->pdev->dev;
> + int i;
> +
> + hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl.buf_index = 0;
> +
> + /* If the trace buffer has already been allocated, zero it. */
> + if (ctrl->trace_buf) {
> + for (i = 0; i < HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_CNT; i++)
> + memset(ctrl->trace_buf[i].addr, 0, HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_SIZE);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ctrl->trace_buf = kcalloc(HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_CNT, sizeof(struct hisi_ptt_dma_buffer),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctrl->trace_buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_CNT; ++i) {
> + ctrl->trace_buf[i].addr = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_SIZE,
> + &ctrl->trace_buf[i].dma,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
dmam_alloc_coherent() would mean that we can drop the manual frees
> + if (!ctrl->trace_buf[i].addr) {
> + hisi_ptt_free_trace_buf(hisi_ptt);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void hisi_ptt_trace_end(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> + writel(0, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL);
> + hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl.status = HISI_PTT_TRACE_STATUS_OFF;
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_ptt_trace_start(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> + struct hisi_ptt_trace_ctrl *ctrl = &hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl;
> + u32 val;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Check device idle before start trace */
> + if (hisi_ptt_wait_trace_hw_idle(hisi_ptt)) {
hisi_ptt_wait_trace_hw_idle() is a bit of an odd odd, as I would expect
it to return true when idle
> + pci_err(hisi_ptt->pdev, "Failed to start trace, the device is still busy.\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + /* Reset the DMA before start tracing */
> + val = readl(hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL);
> + val |= HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_RST;
> + writel(val, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL);
> +
> + hisi_ptt_wait_dma_reset_done(hisi_ptt);
> +
> + val = readl(hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL);
> + val &= ~HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_RST;
> + writel(val, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL);
> +
> + /* Clear the interrupt status */
> + writel(HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_STAT_MASK, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_STAT);
> + writel(0, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_MASK);
> +
> + /* Configure the trace DMA buffer */
> + for (i = 0; i < HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_CNT; i++) {
> + writel(lower_32_bits(ctrl->trace_buf[i].dma),
> + hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_ADDR_BASE_LO_0 +
> + i * HISI_PTT_TRACE_ADDR_STRIDE);
> + writel(upper_32_bits(ctrl->trace_buf[i].dma),
> + hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_ADDR_BASE_HI_0 +
> + i * HISI_PTT_TRACE_ADDR_STRIDE);
> + }
> + writel(HISI_PTT_TRACE_BUF_SIZE, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_ADDR_SIZE);
> +
> + /* Set the trace control register */
> + val = FIELD_PREP(HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_TYPE_SEL, ctrl->type);
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_RXTX_SEL, ctrl->direction);
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_DATA_FORMAT, ctrl->format);
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_TARGET_SEL, hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl.filter);
> + if (!hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl.is_port)
> + val |= HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_FILTER_MODE;
> +
> + /* Start the Trace */
> + val |= HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL_EN;
> + writel(val, hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_CTRL);
> +
> + ctrl->status = HISI_PTT_TRACE_STATUS_ON;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t hisi_ptt_irq(int irq, void *context)
as I said before (I forget the reply), it's odd to add an empty handler.
> +{
> + struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = context;
> + u32 status;
> +
> + status = readl(hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_STAT);
> + if (!(status & HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_STAT_MASK))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists