linux-kernel - Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 93/154] hisi_sas_main.c:undefined reference to `sas_execute_ata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4caa1642-79d6-fcf9-f81e-83feb654afbf@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:42:54 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     <kbuild-all@...ts.01.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 93/154] hisi_sas_main.c:undefined reference to
 `sas_execute_ata_cmd'

On 22/02/2022 11:28, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> I'm not sure where that leaves Damien's series.. it just seems easier to
>> try to take mine again first as Damien's would need to be rebased again
>> (if not based on mine).
> May be just send an incremental patch on top of yours+my series ? But I
> doubt there will be a conflict anyway.
> 

It's actually just the last patch in my series which is the problem, so 
that could make things easier. I have the v3 series ready with the fix 
(apart from more randconfig builds) so I can just send that. Or, if 
Martin, wants an incremental fix, I can send that also.

Thanks,
John