linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi-mem: Allow specifying the byte order in DTR mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:23:04 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <michael@...le.cc>
CC:     <p.yadav@...com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <zhengxunli@...c.com.tw>, <jaimeliao@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi-mem: Allow specifying the byte order in DTR mode

On 2/22/22 16:13, Michael Walle wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Am 2022-02-22 14:54, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com:
>> On 2/21/22 09:44, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know
>>> the content is safe
>>>
>>> Am 2022-02-18 15:58, schrieb Tudor Ambarus:
>>>> Fortunately there are controllers
>>>> that can swap back the bytes at runtime, fixing the endiannesses.
>>>> Provide
>>>> a way for the upper layers to specify the byte order in DTR mode.
>>>
>>> Are there any patches for the atmel-quadspi yet? What happens if
>>
>> not public, but will publish them these days.
>>
>>> the controller doesn't support it? Will there be a software fallback?
>>
>> no need for a fallback, the controller can ignore op->data.dtr_bswap16
>> if
>> it can't swap bytes.
> 
> I don't understand. If the controller doesn't swap the 16bit values,
> you will read the wrong content, no?
> 

In linux no, because macronix swaps bytes on a 2 byte boundary both on
reads and on page program. The problem is when you mix 8D-8D-8D mode and
1-1-1 mode along the boot stages. Let's assume you write all boot binaries
in 1-1-1 mode. When reaching u-boot if you enable 8D-8D-8D mode, when u-boot
will try to get the kernel it will fail, as the flash swaps the bytes compared
to what was written with 1-1-1 mode. You write D0 D1 D2 D3 in 1-1-1 mode and
when reaching u-boot you will read D1 D0 D3 D2 and it will mess the kernel image.