[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220222110547.5c5435a5@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:05:47 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
songmuchun@...edance.com, qirui.001@...edance.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/ftrace: Make function graph use ftrace directly
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:54:44 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> > +int ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller(void)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller(void)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> It's a shame the core code doesn't provide this if we provide an
> implementation of ftrace_graph_func.
As it was only x86_64 that took it out, I wasn't about to remove it. But
now other archs are implementing it, I'm fine with making these weak
functions in the core code.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists