[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9af820b8deecf3b6ea31db0993e83f746221634d.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:02:42 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not use guest root level in
audit
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 19:46 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/18/22 19:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Since I keep bringing it up...
> >
> > From: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@...gle.com>
> > Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 09:43:05 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove MMU auditing
> >
> > Remove mmu_audit.c and all its collateral, the auditing code has suffered
> > severe bitrot, ironically partly due to shadow paging being more stable
> > and thus not benefiting as much from auditing, but mostly due to TDP
> > supplanting shadow paging for non-nested guests and shadowing of nested
> > TDP not heavily stressing the logic that is being audited.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> Queued, thanks. O:-)
I once kind of played with it.
Note that shadow mmu does have bugs - I can easily crash L1/L2 when
doing repeated migrations when I disable NPT either in L0 or L1,
and when I force the mmu to be always sync (see my strict_mmu patch),
the crashes go away.
mmu audit maybe could have helped with that.
But I won't argue too much about this.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists