[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f18cfd048609276cc298dbfa01628bd2fa15937.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:32:52 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/18] KVM: x86/mmu: clear MMIO cache when unloading
the MMU
On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 16:03 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> For cleanliness, do not leave a stale GVA in the cache after all the roots are
> cleared. In practice, kvm_mmu_load will go through kvm_mmu_sync_roots if
> paging is on, and will not use vcpu_match_mmio_gva at all if paging is off.
> However, leaving data in the cache might cause bugs in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index b01160716c6a..4e8e3e9530ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5111,6 +5111,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_unload(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> __kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.root_mmu);
> __kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu);
> + vcpu_clear_mmio_info(vcpu, MMIO_GVA_ANY);
> }
>
> static bool need_remote_flush(u64 old, u64 new)
One thing that bothers me for a while with all of this is that
vcpu->arch.{mmio_gva|mmio_access|mmio_gfn|mmio_gen} are often called mmio cache,
while we also install reserved bit SPTEs and also call this a mmio cache.
The above is basically a cache of a cache sort of.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists