[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOCk7NpJ5ui+uTKvKeShKmzeKpZkwqCDtyAd_bt2PJKGhE=Gww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:48:06 -0700
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpio: Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as immutable
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:40 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> In order to move away from gpiolib messing with the internals of
> unsuspecting irqchips, add a flag by which irqchips advertise
> that they are not to be messed with, and do solemnly swear that
> they correctly call into the gpiolib helpers wueh required.
"wueh"? Should that be "when"?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists