[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhZ6uAmGcVjvNZy6@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:19:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] add support for fwnode in i2c mux system and sfp
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 05:41:30PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> There were separately some issues with people trying to create
> completely swnode based enumeration mechanisms for things that required
> totally independent code for handling swnodes which seemed very
> concerning but it's not clear to me if that's what's going on here.
This is the case IIUC.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists