lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhaAZNaav720xXXx@dev-arch.archlinux-ax161>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:43:48 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
Cc:     "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@...dia.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 2/2] dmaengine: tegra: Add tegra gpcdma driver

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 03:49:09AM +0000, Akhil R wrote:
> > Hi Akhil,
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:09:34PM +0530, Akhil R wrote:
> > > Adding GPC DMA controller driver for Tegra. The driver supports dma
> > > transfers between memory to memory, IO peripheral to memory and memory
> > > to IO peripheral.
> > >
> > > Co-developed-by: Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@...dia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@...dia.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@...dia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@...dia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/dma/Kconfig            |   11 +
> > >  drivers/dma/Makefile           |    1 +
> > >  drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c | 1507
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 1519 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > +static const struct __maybe_unused dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops =
> > > +{
> > 
> > The __maybe_unused cannot split the type ("struct dev_pm_ops") otherwise it
> > causes a clang warning:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/202202221207.lQ53BwKp-lkp@intel.com/
> > 
> > static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops __maybe_unused = {
> > 
> > would look a litle better I think. However, is this attribute even needed? The
> > variable is unconditionally used below, so there should be no warning about it
> > being unused?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Nathan
> > 
> > > +     SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_pm_suspend,
> > > +tegra_dma_pm_resume) };
> > > +
> > > +static struct platform_driver tegra_dma_driver = {
> > > +     .driver = {
> > > +             .name   = "tegra-gpcdma",
> > > +             .pm     = &tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops,
> > > +             .of_match_table = tegra_dma_of_match,
> > > +     },
> > > +     .probe          = tegra_dma_probe,
> > > +     .remove         = tegra_dma_remove,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +module_platform_driver(tegra_dma_driver);
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA Tegra GPC DMA Controller driver");
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@...dia.com>");
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@...dia.com>");
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> > >
> 
> Hi Nathan,
> 
> Thanks. Will update the same.
> 
> I am getting notification for the below warning also.
> 
> >> drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c:898:53: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
>                            FIELD_PREP(TEGRA_GPCDMA_HIGH_ADDR_DST_PTR, (dest >> 32));
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202202230559.bLOEMEUh-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> I suppose, this is because it is compiled against a different ARCH other than arm64.
> For arm64, the dma_addr_t is 64 bytes, and this warning does not occur.
> Could this be ignored for now? If not, could you suggest a fix, if possible?

I am not really familiar with the DMA API and dma_addr_t so I am not
sure about a proper fix.

You could cast dest to u64 to guarantee it is a type that can be shifted
by 32 but that might not be right for CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n. If the
driver is not expected to run without CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT, then
this is probably fine.

You could mark this driver 'depends on PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT' if it cannot
run with CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y + CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n but I do not
see any other drivers that do that, which might mean that is not a
proper fix.

Please do not ignore the warning, as it will show up with ARCH=arm
allmodconfig, which has -Werror enabled.

Cheers,
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ