[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEucnZPt_dhaSXCegeFE0gs=dSDfv7CJSq4HCW_4a4XfGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:19:03 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: mst <mst@...hat.com>, jasowang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: aovid reading flag from the descriptor ring
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:13 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Commit 72b5e8958738 ("virtio-ring: store DMA metadata in desc_extra
> for split virtqueue") tries to make it possible for the driver to not
> read from the descriptor ring to prevent the device from corrupting
> the descriptor ring. But it still read the descriptor flag from the
> descriptor ring during buffer detach.
>
> This patch fixes by always store the descriptor flag no matter whether
> DMA API is used and then we can avoid reading descriptor flag from the
> descriptor ring. This eliminates the possibly of unexpected next
> descriptor caused by the wrong flag (e.g the next flag).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Michael, any comment for this?
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 00f64f2f8b72..28734f4e57d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> }
> /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> - if (!indirect && vq->use_dma_api)
> + if (!indirect)
> vq->split.desc_extra[prev & (vq->split.vring.num - 1)].flags &=
> ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
>
> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> /* Put back on free list: unmap first-level descriptors and find end */
> i = head;
>
> - while (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
> + while (vq->split.desc_extra[i].flags & nextflag) {
> vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
> i = vq->split.desc_extra[i].next;
> vq->vq.num_free++;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists