linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bpf: move the bpf syscall sysctl table to its own module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YhW335H//CkhCut8@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:28:15 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Yan Zhu <zhuyan34@...wei.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, zengweilin@...wei.com,
        liucheng32@...wei.com, nixiaoming@...wei.com,
        xiechengliang1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: move the bpf syscall sysctl table to its own module

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:35:29AM +0800, Yan Zhu wrote:
> +static struct ctl_table bpf_syscall_table[] = {
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "unprivileged_bpf_disabled",
> +		.data		= &sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= bpf_unpriv_handler,
> +		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
> +		.extra2		= SYSCTL_TWO,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "bpf_stats_enabled",
> +		.data		= &bpf_stats_enabled_key.key,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(bpf_stats_enabled_key),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= bpf_stats_handler,
> +	},
> +	{ }
> +};

No progress towards a counted array instead of a NULL terminated one?