linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: memory: lpddr2: Adjust revision ID property to match lpddr3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13af6f53-2a8c-c8d5-f061-baf59b511e58@canonical.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:17:52 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: memory: lpddr2: Adjust revision ID
 property to match lpddr3

On 23/02/2022 03:44, Julius Werner wrote:
>>> +  revision-id:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>>> +    minItems: 2
>>> +    maxItems: 2
>>
>> You need maximum value under items.  See:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2c2x0.yaml
> 
> Sorry, can you clarify how this is supposed to be? Do you want
> 
>  revision-id:
>    minItems: 2
>    maxItems: 2
>    items:
>      minItems: 2
>      maxItems: 2
> 
> or just
> 
>  revision-id:
>    items:
>      minItems: 2
>      maxItems: 2
> 
> I see examples of both in the file you linked (and also examples of
> what my original patch did).

There is no example of the first case in linked file. I am not sure if
it is correct even... I did not ask about maximum number of items, but
"maximum value", so like this:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2c2x0.yaml#L73

> Is there any authoritative documentation
> somewhere I can read that specifies which of those is correct? (I
> tried looking at
> https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/array.html#length
> but I'm not sure if that's relevant here.)

example-schema.yaml is the best, but it might not cover that part. We
need more docs, I know...


> For updating existing DTSes, do you want that in the same patch or a
> separate patch in a series?

Separate patch in this series, please.


Best regards,
Krzysztof