linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] dt-bindings: pwm: add microchip corepwm binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YhX5suBeOgHKqcVa@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:09:06 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        conor.dooley@...rochip.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        brgl@...ev.pl, robh+dt@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        lewis.hanly@...rochip.com, daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com,
        ivan.griffin@...rochip.com, atishp@...osinc.com,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] dt-bindings: pwm: add microchip corepwm binding

On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:12:49AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/02/2022 07:20, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 01:58:35PM +0000, conor.dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> > >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > >>
> > >> Add device tree bindings for the Microchip fpga fabric based "core" PWM
> > >> controller.
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > >> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> > > 
> > > I like it:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > 
> > > nitpick: Put your S-o-b last in the commit log. (This doesn't justify a
> > > resend IMHO)
> > 
> > It should be the opposite - the first. First author signs the patch,
> > then comes review and finally an ack. Putting SoB at then suggests that
> > tags were accumulated before sending patch, out of mailing list.
> 
> well, or in an earlier revision of this patch as is the case here. One
> of the ideas of S-o-b is that the order shows the flow of the patch
> states and if this patch ends in git with:
> 
> 	Referred-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 	Singed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 	Backed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> 	Singed-off-by: Peter Maintainer <pm@...mple.com>
> 
> I'd expect that Backed-by was added by Peter, not Conor.
> (Modified the tags on purpose to not interfere with b4's tag pickup, I
> guess you humans still get the point.)

I tend to like *-by tags to appear chronologically.

  Suggested              (suggested-by)
  Authored               (signed-off-by)
  Co-Authored            (signed-off-by/co-developed-by)
  Reviewed/Acked/Tested  (reviewed-by/acked-by/tested-by)
  Committed              (signed-off-by)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog