[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTQd_5Ei9RDUg5uYAAjf0+idCqUtxdemb0CEMsxq7m3+UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:21:59 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, Wei Fu <wefu@...hat.com>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
Wang Junqiang <wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 13/21] riscv: compat: process: Add UXL_32 support in start_thread
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 9:42 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 07:05:37 PST (-0800), guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > If the current task is in COMPAT mode, set SR_UXL_32 in status for
> > returning userspace. We need CONFIG _COMPAT to prevent compiling
> > errors with rv32 defconfig.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> > index 03ac3aa611f5..1a666ad299b4 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
> > }
> > regs->epc = pc;
> > regs->sp = sp;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > + if (is_compat_task())
> > + regs->status |= SR_UXL_32;
>
> Not sure if I'm just misunderstanding the bit ops here, but aren't we
> trying to set the UXL field to 1 (for UXL=32)? That should be a bit
> field set op, not just an OR.
You are right, I would modify like this:
+ if (is_compat_task())
+ regs->status = (regs->status & ~SR_UXL) | SR_UXL_32;
+ else
+. regs->status = (regs->status & ~SR_UXL) | SR_UXL_64;
>
> > +#endif
> > }
> >
> > void flush_thread(void)
>
> Additionally: this isn't really an issue so much with this patch, but it
> does bring up that we're relying on someone else to have set UXL=64 on
> CONFIG_COMPAT=n systems. I don't see that in any spec anywhere, so we
> should really be setting UXL in Linux for all systems (ie, not just those with
> COMPAT=y).
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists