linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: mt6366: Add support for MT6366 regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:58:53 +0800
From:   Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] regulator: mt6366: Add support for MT6366 regulator

On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 12:59 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:54:05PM +0800, Johnson Wang wrote:
> > The MT6366 is a regulator found on boards based on MediaTek MT8186
> > and
> > probably other SoCs. It is a so called pmic and connects as a slave
> > to
> > SoC using SPI, wrapped inside the pmic-wrapper.
> 
> Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Hi Mark,

Thank you for review.

Do these regulator patches need some improvement?
If yes, please give me your advices.

Otherwise, is it possible to apply these patches in the future?

Thanks.

BRs,
Johnson Wang