[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220223113303.4cashhkp624yo5sg@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:03:03 +0530
From: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
<yaliang.wang@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/32] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: unify function names
On 22/02/22 08:26AM, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-02-22 08:23, schrieb Pratyush Yadav:
> > On 21/02/22 01:07PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > To avoid name clashes unify all the function and static object names
> > > and
> > > use one of the following prefixes which should be sufficiently unique:
> > > - <vendor>_nor_
> > > - <flash_family>_nor_
> > > - <flash_part>_
> >
> > Shouldn't this be "<flash_part>_nor_"?
>
> No, a part name is already unique and its the same "style" as spi nand
> is doing it.
Okay. Fine by me.
I have not went and checked every single function changed. I trust you
to get them right.
Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists