lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:09:19 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, jmattson@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/hyperv: Add missing ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM
 dependency



On 2/23/2022 7:47 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:02:49PM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> On 2/23/2022 6:56 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 06:43:40PM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>>>> Hyper-V code check cpuid during runtime and there is no Hyper-V
>>>> isolation VM option.
>>>
>>> So how does "Current Hyper-V Isolation VM requires AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT" work
>>> exactly?
>>>
>>> Please explain in detail and not in piecemeal sentences.
>>>
>> The kernel in the image needs to select AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT option
>> otherwise the kernel can't boot up due to missing SEV support and
>> sev_es_ghcb_hv_call() always return error.
> 
> If kernel boots under SEV, doesn't it mean we have 'sme_me_mask'
> initialized? If it is non zero hv_is_isolation_supported() check in
> cc_platform_has() has zero effect as it checked after 'sme_me_mask'.
> 
> I still have no idea what is going on.
> 
> How SEV related to HyperV isolation? How detection happens? Could you
> give full picture?
> 

Hi Kriil:
      Current Hyper-V Isolation VM is unenlightened VM design. Hyper-V 
hides SEV capability from Linux guest and expose Hyper-V cpuid to show 
Hyper-V isolation VM capability. So sme_me_mask is zero in this case 
because SEV capability cpuid returns not-support.
      Hyper-V Isolation VM code uses some SEV API sev_es_ghcb_hv_call() 
to share code and so it's necessary to select AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT option for
Hyper-V Isolation VM.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ