[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdd3488193dfb0c60e219f02f181dc41bec2c54e.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:11:05 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if PAE roots linger after
kvm_mmu_unload
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 18:23 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/18/22 18:14, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Checkpatch doesn't like it, and IMO the existing asserts
> > are unnecessary.
>
> I agree that removing the assertions could be another way to go.
>
> A third and better one could be to just wait until pae_root is gone. I
> have started looking at it but I would like your opinion on one detail;
> see question I posted at
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/7ccb16e5-579e-b3d9-cedc-305152ef9b8f@redhat.com/.
>
> For now I'll drop this patch.
IMHO, the idea of having shadow pages backing the synthetic pages like pae roots,
is a very good idea.
I hope I get to review that RFC very soon.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists