lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4771de3911c24966b01fef9cf43f2d33@AcuMS.aculab.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:57:26 +0000 From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> To: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>, "42.hyeyoo@...il.com" <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, "penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>, "rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>, "iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, "vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>, "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>, "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, "steffen.klassert@...unet.com" <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, "gor@...ux.ibm.com" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, "agordeev@...ux.ibm.com" <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, "borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, "svens@...ux.ibm.com" <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>, "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, "wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: check dma_mask for streaming mapping allocs From: Christoph Hellwig > Sent: 23 February 2022 14:26 > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:28:13AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > Could you tell more why this is wrong? According to > > Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst and DMA code, __dma_alloc_pages() is > > the core function of dma_alloc_pages()/dma_alloc_noncoherent() which are > > obviously streaming mapping, > > Why are they "obviously" streaming mappings? > > > why do we need to check > > dev->coherent_dma_mask here? Because dev->coherent_dma_mask is the subset > > of dev->dma_mask, it's safer to use dev->coherent_dma_mask in these > > places? This is confusing, I talked to Hyeonggon in private mail, he has > > the same feeling. > > Think of th coherent_dma_mask as dma_alloc_mask. It is the mask for the > DMA memory allocator. dma_mask is the mask for the dma_map_* routines. I suspect it is all to allow for things like: - A 64bit system with memory above 4G. - A device that can only generate 32bit addresses. - Some feature of the memory system (or bus bridges) that restricts cache snooping to the low 1G of address space. So dma_alloc_coherent() has to allocate memory below 1G. The dma_map functions have to use bounce-buffers for addresses above 4G. dma_alloc_noncoherent() can allocate anything below 4G and so avoid bounce buffers later on. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists