linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:45:52 +0000
From:   Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
CC:     "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)



> On Feb 24, 2022, at 11:37 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2/24/22 07:08, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>>>> attempt at this point.  I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>>> 
>>>>> on x86_64:
>>>>> 
>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>>>> Selected by [y]:
>>>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>>> 
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>> 
>>> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
>> 
>> I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
>> you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
>> fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
> 
> Not all of it -- it's missing one line:
> 
>> config NFSD_V2_ACL
>>        bool
>>        depends on NFSD
>> 
>> config NFSD_V3_ACL
>>        bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
>>        depends on NFSD      <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>        select NFSD_V2_ACL
>>        help
> 
> When I add that, I no longer see the problem.

That's the fix. I guess next-20220223 hasn't pulled in my latest
for-next yet.

--
Chuck Lever