linux-kernel - Re: [v2,4/4] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yhf2a/h6H1/9sN6b@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:19:39 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     xinlei.lee@...iatek.com
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        jitao.shi@...iatek.com, allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [v2,4/4] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:32:51PM +0800, xinlei.lee@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> 
> Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
>        - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm
>        - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
>        - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
> +      - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm
>        - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm
>        - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm

It seems unlikely that every SoC has a different version of h/w for 
something as simple as a PWM. There's not an appropriate fallback? The 
first version from an SoC that has all the features and would work with 
existing driver unchanged?

Rob