lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB5481DCB01F443BFC559430C4DC3D9@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 03:44:20 +0000
From:   Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net/mlx5: Introduce devlink param to
 disable SF aux dev probe

Hi Jakub,

> From: Parav Pandit
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 8:16 PM
> 
> > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 6:43 AM
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:20:17 +0200 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> > > v1->v2:
> > >  - updated example to make clear SF port and SF device creation PFs
> > >  - added example when SF port and device creation PFs are on
> > > different hosts
> >
> > How does this address my comments?
> >
> Which one?
> Your suggestion in [1] to specify vnet during port function spawning time?
> Or
> Your suggestion in [2] to add "noprobe" option?

> Saeed is offline this week, and I want to gather his feedback as well on passing
> hints from port spawning side to host side.

Saeed is back. Saeed, others and I discussed the per SF knob further.
The option to indicate to not initialize the SF device during port spawning time is very useful to users.

So, how about crafting below UAPI?
Example:

Esw side:
$ devlink port add <dev> flavour pcisf .. 
$ devlink port function set <port> hw_addr 00:11:22:33:44:55 initialize false/true ...

The "initialize" option indicates whether a function should fully initialize or not at driver level on the host side.
When initialize=false, the device will spawn but not initialize until a user on the host initialize it using the existing devlink reload API on this SF device.

For example, on host side, a user will be able to do,
$ devlink dev auxiliary/mlx5_core.sf2 resource/param set
$ devlink dev reload auxiliary/mlx5_core.sf.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ