linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:02:48 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic
 pwm schema

On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Heiko Stuebner wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2022, 10:16:01 CET schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> > > Include generic pwm.yaml schema, which enforces PWM node naming.  Keep
> > > the old name in bindings as deprecated.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml    | 4 ++++
> > 
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> what is your expectation regarding this patch?
> 
> Are you planning to merge it or are you expecting this to go through
> some other tree?
> 
> The binding-change here is backward-comaptible in that the old
> node-name is still in it, only marked as deprecated, so in theory
> this patch should be able to be applied on its own without
> causing defects.

In an ideal world, it would be broken up and I would take the MFD
part.   Is that possible or are there dependencies?

Or, worse still, does the whole set need to be applied at once?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog