[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac624e07-5310-438a-dce3-d2edb01e8031@linux-ipv6.be>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:08:59 +0200
From: Stijn Tintel <stijn@...ux-ipv6.be>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY auto-pinning
On 24/02/2022 01:15, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 6:37 PM Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:51 PM Stijn Tintel <stijn@...ux-ipv6.be> wrote:
>>> When a BPF map of type BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY doesn't have the
>>> max_entries parameter set, this parameter will be set to the number of
>>> possible CPUs. Due to this, the map_is_reuse_compat function will return
>>> false, causing the following error when trying to reuse the map:
>>>
>>> libbpf: couldn't reuse pinned map at '/sys/fs/bpf/m_logging': parameter mismatch
>>>
>>> Fix this by checking against the number of possible CPUs if the
>>> max_entries parameter is not set in the map definition.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 57a00f41644f ("libbpf: Add auto-pinning of maps when loading BPF objects")
>>> Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel <stijn@...ux-ipv6.be>
>> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>>
>> I think the following fix would be more future proof, but the patch
>> as-is is better for
>> stable backport? How about we add a follow up patch on top of current
>> patch to fix
>> def->max_entries once for all?
> Keeping special logic for PERF_EVENT_ARRAY in one place is
> preferrable. With this, the changes in map_is_reuse_compat() shouldn't
> be necessary at all. Stijn, can you please send v2 with Song's
> proposed changes?
>
Will do!
Thanks,
Stijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists