lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:08:59 +0200
From:   Stijn Tintel <stijn@...ux-ipv6.be>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY auto-pinning

On 24/02/2022 01:15, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 6:37 PM Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:51 PM Stijn Tintel <stijn@...ux-ipv6.be> wrote:
>>> When a BPF map of type BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY doesn't have the
>>> max_entries parameter set, this parameter will be set to the number of
>>> possible CPUs. Due to this, the map_is_reuse_compat function will return
>>> false, causing the following error when trying to reuse the map:
>>>
>>> libbpf: couldn't reuse pinned map at '/sys/fs/bpf/m_logging': parameter mismatch
>>>
>>> Fix this by checking against the number of possible CPUs if the
>>> max_entries parameter is not set in the map definition.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 57a00f41644f ("libbpf: Add auto-pinning of maps when loading BPF objects")
>>> Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel <stijn@...ux-ipv6.be>
>> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>>
>> I think the following fix would be more future proof, but the patch
>> as-is is better for
>> stable backport? How about we add a follow up patch on top of current
>> patch to fix
>> def->max_entries once for all?
> Keeping special logic for PERF_EVENT_ARRAY in one place is
> preferrable. With this, the changes in map_is_reuse_compat() shouldn't
> be necessary at all. Stijn, can you please send v2 with Song's
> proposed changes?
>
Will do!

Thanks,
Stijn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ