linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: Ensure quiet_vmstat() is called when the idle tick was stopped too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220224132816.qsfa66ao3xdjdxxx@ava.usersys.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:28:16 +0000
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
To:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: Ensure quiet_vmstat() is called when the
 idle tick was stopped too

On Thu 2022-02-24 10:14 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> If the per-CPU vmstat_update is limited to happen once per second, that
> shouldnt be a significant performance impact?

Perhaps not. Albeit, is the interrupt worth it? Then again it could indeed
be a long time before the idle task is selected and a return to idle code
were we'd check for any remaining differentials with the aforementioned
patch.

Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin