[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3896e3b5-0e6c-858a-8e4f-732ab03b7286@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:23:43 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peng Hao <flyingpenghao@...il.com>, seanjc@...gle.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM:nVMX: Make setup/unsetup under the same conditions
On 2/22/22 11:40, Peng Hao wrote:
> From: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
>
> Make sure nested_vmx_hardware_setup/unsetup() are called in pairs under
> the same conditions. Calling nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() when nested
> is false "works" right now because it only calls free_page() on zero-
> initialized pointers, but it's possible that more code will be added to
> nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() in the future.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 75ed7d6f35cc..9fad3c73395a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -7852,7 +7852,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
> vmx_set_cpu_caps();
>
> r = alloc_kvm_area();
> - if (r)
> + if (r && nested)
> nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup();
>
> kvm_set_posted_intr_wakeup_handler(pi_wakeup_handler);
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists