[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3CFFC488-CC2F-4B2B-9DD3-F939468A85C7@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:44 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 22 (NFSD_V2_ACL)
> On Feb 24, 2022, at 1:45 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/23/22 07:58, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/22/22 17:41, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Note that today's -next does not include the akpm tree since it's been a
>>>> long day and the conflicts seemed more than it was wise for me to
>>>> attempt at this point. I'll have another go tomorrow but no guarantees.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20220217:
>>>
>>> on x86_64:
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NFSD_V2_ACL
>>> Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y] && NFSD [=n]
>>> Selected by [y]:
>>> - NFSD_V3_ACL [=y] && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=y]
>>
>> Thanks, Randy. I think I've got it addressed in my for-next.
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I'm still seeing this in next-20220223...
I tested my fixed version of the commit with the randconfig
you attached to yesterday's email. Do you see this in
fs/nfsd/Kconfig from next-20220223 ?
config NFSD_V2_ACL
bool
depends on NFSD
config NFSD_V3_ACL
bool "NFS server support for the NFSv3 ACL protocol extension"
depends on NFSD
select NFSD_V2_ACL
help
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists