[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6BqEn8azap_zcWq0Zkvv8mRFg6g0UX2fPQXwzT+F6V=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:31:15 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Cache the last valid build_id.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 4:05 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> For binaries that are statically linked, consecutive stack frames are
> likely to be in the same VMA and therefore have the same build id.
> As an optimization for this case, we can cache the previous frame's
> VMA, if the new frame has the same VMA as the previous one, reuse the
> previous one's build id. We are holding the MM locks as reader across
> the entire loop, so we don't need to worry about VMA going away.
>
> Tested through "stacktrace_build_id" and "stacktrace_build_id_nmi" in
> test_progs.
>
> Suggested-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Nice optimization!
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists