linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 07/10] lib: add crc64 tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220225161902.GA14059@lst.de>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 17:19:02 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, colyli@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 07/10] lib: add crc64 tests

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 08:12:59AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> I don't have experience with kunit, but I'll look into that.
> 
> I am already changing the way this gets tested. Eric recommended adding
> to the crypto "testmgr", and I've done that on my private tree. That
> test framework exercises a lot more than this this patch, and it did
> reveal a problem with how I've implemented the initial XOR when the
> buffer is split, so I have some minor updates coming soon.

I guess if we exercise the algorithm through that we don't really need
another low-level test anyway, right?