[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3004368d5784e3c2a40e3229d3618a88924b11e.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:00:18 -0600
From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Have traceon and traceoff trigger honor the
instance
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 22:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> If a trigger is set on an event to disable or enable tracing within
> an
> instance, then tracing should be disabled or enabled in the instance
> and
> not at the top level, which is confusing to users.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: ae63b31e4d0e2 ("tracing: Separate out trace events from global
> variables")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ----
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index e0d50c9577f3..efe563140f27 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -1295,6 +1295,16 @@ traceon_trigger(struct event_trigger_data
> *data,
> struct trace_buffer *buffer, void *rec,
> struct ring_buffer_event *event)
> {
> + struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
> +
> + if (file) {
> + if (tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
> + return;
> +
> + tracer_tracing_on(file->tr);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (tracing_is_on())
> return;
>
> @@ -1306,8 +1316,15 @@ traceon_count_trigger(struct
> event_trigger_data *data,
> struct trace_buffer *buffer, void *rec,
> struct ring_buffer_event *event)
> {
> - if (tracing_is_on())
> - return;
> + struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
> +
> + if (file) {
> + if (tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
> + return;
> + } else {
> + if (tracing_is_on())
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (!data->count)
> return;
> @@ -1315,7 +1332,10 @@ traceon_count_trigger(struct
> event_trigger_data *data,
> if (data->count != -1)
> (data->count)--;
>
> - tracing_on();
> + if (file)
> + tracer_tracing_on(file->tr);
> + else
> + tracing_on();
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -1323,6 +1343,16 @@ traceoff_trigger(struct event_trigger_data
> *data,
> struct trace_buffer *buffer, void *rec,
> struct ring_buffer_event *event)
> {
> + struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
> +
> + if (file) {
> + if (!tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
> + return;
> +
> + tracer_tracing_off(file->tr);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (!tracing_is_on())
> return;
>
> @@ -1334,8 +1364,15 @@ traceoff_count_trigger(struct
> event_trigger_data *data,
> struct trace_buffer *buffer, void *rec,
> struct ring_buffer_event *event)
> {
> - if (!tracing_is_on())
> - return;
> + struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
> +
> + if (file) {
> + if (!tracer_tracing_is_on(file->tr))
> + return;
> + } else {
> + if (!tracing_is_on())
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (!data->count)
> return;
> @@ -1343,7 +1380,10 @@ traceoff_count_trigger(struct
> event_trigger_data *data,
> if (data->count != -1)
> (data->count)--;
>
> - tracing_off();
> + if (file)
> + tracer_tracing_off(file->tr);
> + else
> + tracing_off();
> }
>
> static int
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Tom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists