linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] sched: Introduce per memory space current virtual cpu id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:35:29 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>, David.Laight@...LAB.COM,
        carlos@...hat.com, Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] sched: Introduce per memory space current
 virtual cpu id

Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> writes:

> This feature allows the scheduler to expose a current virtual cpu id
> to user-space. This virtual cpu id is within the possible cpus range,
> and is temporarily (and uniquely) assigned while threads are actively
> running within a memory space. If a memory space has fewer threads than
> cores, or is limited to run on few cores concurrently through sched
> affinity or cgroup cpusets, the virtual cpu ids will be values close
> to 0, thus allowing efficient use of user-space memory for per-cpu
> data structures.

So I have one possibly (probably) dumb question: if I'm writing a
program to make use of virtual CPU IDs, how do I know what the maximum
ID will be?  It seems like one of the advantages of this mechanism would
be not having to be prepared for anything in the physical ID space, but
is there any guarantee that the virtual-ID space will be smaller?
Something like "no larger than the number of threads", say?

Thanks,

jon