linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/3] list: test: Add test for list_del_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220225025247.1888244-1-davidgow@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:52:46 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] list: test: Add test for list_del_init_careful()

The list_del_init_careful() function was added[1] after the list KUnit
test. Add a very basic test to cover it.

Note that this test only covers the single-threaded behaviour (which
matches list_del_init()), as is already the case with the test for
list_empty_careful().

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c6fe44d96fc1536af5b11cd859686453d1b7bfd1

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---

Changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220209052813.854014-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Fix a comment style issue.
- Add Reviewed-by tags.

Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220208040122.695258-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Fix the test calling list_del_init() instead of
  list_del_init_careful()
- Improve the comment noting we only test single-threaded behaviour.

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220205061539.273330-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Patch 1/3 unchanged
---
 lib/list-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c
index ee09505df16f..302b7382bff4 100644
--- a/lib/list-test.c
+++ b/lib/list-test.c
@@ -161,6 +161,26 @@ static void list_test_list_del_init(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a));
 }
 
+static void list_test_list_del_init_careful(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* NOTE: This test only checks the behaviour of this function in
+	 * isolation. It does not verify memory model guarantees.
+	 */
+	struct list_head a, b;
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+	list_add_tail(&a, &list);
+	list_add_tail(&b, &list);
+
+	/* before: [list] -> a -> b */
+	list_del_init_careful(&a);
+	/* after: [list] -> b, a initialised */
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a));
+}
+
 static void list_test_list_move(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct list_head a, b;
@@ -707,6 +727,7 @@ static struct kunit_case list_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_replace_init),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_swap),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_del_init),
+	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_del_init_careful),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move_tail),
 	KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_bulk_move_tail),
-- 
2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog