[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220225175111.GA367168@bhelgaas>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:51:11 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PCI: Add PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_*_SHIFT macros
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 06:22:16PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:37:56 -0600
> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Yes, it's a mix. For some recent additions, I've resisted adding the
> > _SHIFT macros on the theory that they clutter the file, they never
> > change, and the main point of the #defines is readability and so
> > grep/tags/etc can find things.
> >
> > There are a *few* users of FIELD_PREP() and FIELD_GET():
> >
> > git grep -E "FIELD_(GET|PREP)\(PCI_EXP"
> >
> > and I'm inclined to go that direction in the future. What do you
> > think?
>
> I am also pro that direction.
>
> Would you also like to convert current usages in the .c driver files?
>
> We can't remove the existing macros since they are in UAPI, but we can
> convert drivers so that they don't use _SHIFT macros.
Certainly not a high priority, but it actually looks like there aren't
*that* many uses in drivers/pci/, so I'd be OK with converting them.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists