lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:02:53 +0530
From:   "Mukunda,Vijendar" <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
        krisman@...labora.com,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, wtli@...oton.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/9] ASoC: amd: vg: fix for pm resume callback
 sequence



On 2/24/22 5:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:49:30 +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
>> The previous condition is used to cross check only the active
>> stream status for I2S HS instance playback and capture use cases.
>>
>> Modified logic to invoke sequence for two i2s controller instances.
>>
>>
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fbroonie%2Fsound.git&amp;data=04%7C01%7CVijendar.Mukunda%40amd.com%7C3a19f223da704ef29da308d9f7904df5%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637813021442156506%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=EfbRAjgpLmD0cuSsnfJVtdRIP1OqVPh3pxcTD6AKx6c%3D&amp;reserved=0 for-linus
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/9] ASoC: amd: vg: fix for pm resume callback sequence
>       (no commit info)
This patch hasn't been applied to tree.
Should I re-send the patch ?

--
Vijendar
> [2/9] ASoC: amd: vangogh: refactor i2s master mode clock sequence code
>       commit: 5ca4cf2c83dac27768f1d7d3e2404f5a17830ca5
> [3/9] ASoC: nau8821: enable no_capture_mute flag
>       commit: aa9753a4677d0a2c53e7e46ca173c985a3f7b83e
> [4/9] ASoC: amd: vg: update platform clock control sequence
>       commit: 9a617f0e109cfba2017d76f807ebb3a00c47bdca
> [5/9] ASoC: amd: vg: apply sample bits pcm constraint
>       commit: 0c38cc1dd17e766eada0aa44be4c1a47bcbb7bc3
> [6/9] ASoC: amd: vg: update acp init and deinit sequence
>       commit: a9230ccc0c6f5fca0b94f57729dc61e0a6098a0a
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ