[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c848c7a19d1557d9038d3bdd64a67385aa788c8f.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:01:37 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] ima: define a new template field 'd-type' and a
new template 'ima-ngv2'
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 10:46 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Thanks, Eric. I really like your suggestion. Currently, type is
> > defined as either "ima" or "verity". Are you ok with prefixing each
> > record with these strings?
> >
>
> As I mentioned before I think "full_hash" would be more descriptive than "ima".
> (All of this is part of IMA.) It's up to you though.
Sorry, to me that doesn't sense. Either we use "full_hash" and
"Merkle-tree", or "ima" and "verity".
--
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists