lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:43:29 -0500
From:   Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Cache the last valid build_id.

On 2/23/22 19:05, Hao Luo wrote:
> For binaries that are statically linked, consecutive stack frames are
> likely to be in the same VMA and therefore have the same build id.
> As an optimization for this case, we can cache the previous frame's
> VMA, if the new frame has the same VMA as the previous one, reuse the
> previous one's build id. We are holding the MM locks as reader across
> the entire loop, so we don't need to worry about VMA going away.
> 
> Tested through "stacktrace_build_id" and "stacktrace_build_id_nmi" in
> test_progs.
> 
> Suggested-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>

Thanks,
Pasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ