[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7f26f93-c5f8-2abc-e186-5d179706ae8e@soleen.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:43:29 -0500
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Cache the last valid build_id.
On 2/23/22 19:05, Hao Luo wrote:
> For binaries that are statically linked, consecutive stack frames are
> likely to be in the same VMA and therefore have the same build id.
> As an optimization for this case, we can cache the previous frame's
> VMA, if the new frame has the same VMA as the previous one, reuse the
> previous one's build id. We are holding the MM locks as reader across
> the entire loop, so we don't need to worry about VMA going away.
>
> Tested through "stacktrace_build_id" and "stacktrace_build_id_nmi" in
> test_progs.
>
> Suggested-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Thanks,
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists