linux-kernel - Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Extend DEFINE_DRM_GEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YhlLrujgN2Ovv5JW@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:35:42 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc:     Ville Syrjälä 
        <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Extend DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS() for
 optional fops

Hi Rob,

> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gem.h b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> > > index 35e7f44c2a75..987e78b18244 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> > > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object {
> > >   * non-static version of this you're probably doing it wrong and will break the
> > >   * THIS_MODULE reference by accident.
> > >   */
> > > -#define DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS(name) \
> > > +#define DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS(name, ...) \
> > >       static const struct file_operations name = {\
> > >               .owner          = THIS_MODULE,\
> > >               .open           = drm_open,\
> > > @@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object {
> > >               .read           = drm_read,\
> > >               .llseek         = noop_llseek,\
> > >               .mmap           = drm_gem_mmap,\
> > > +             ##__VA_ARGS__\
> > >       }
> >
> > Would it not be less convoluted to make the macro only provide
> > the initializers? So you'd get something like:
> >
> > static const struct file_operations foo = {
> >         DRM_GEM_FOPS,
> >         .my_stuff = whatever,
> > };
> >
> 
> Hmm, I like my color of the bikeshed, but I guess it is a matter of opinion ;-)
Or less surprise. Most similar macros provides initializers only.

Try "git grep DRM_.*OPS  | grep define" in include/drm
and take a look at the hits.

	Sam