[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7856aa45-d8fc-ca2c-0b95-302f94378c7a@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 23:25:21 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, khilman@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: fix regression from
errata i940 fix
On 19/02/2022 01:03, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 2/3/22 23:35, Drew Fustini wrote:
>> The existing fix for errata i940 causes a conflict for IPU2 which is
>> using timer 3 and 4. From arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-ipu-dsp-common.dtsi:
>>
>> &ipu2 {
>> mboxes = <&mailbox6 &mbox_ipu2_ipc3x>;
>> ti,timers = <&timer3>;
>> ti,watchdog-timers = <&timer4>, <&timer9>;
>> };
>>
>> The conflict was noticed when booting mainline on the BeagleBoard X15
>> which has a TI AM5728 SoC:
>>
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: 55020000.ipu is available
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: powering up 55020000.ipu
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: Booting fw image dra7-ipu2-fw.xem4
>> omap-rproc 55020000.ipu: could not get timer platform device
>> omap-rproc 55020000.ipu: omap_rproc_enable_timers failed: -19
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: can't start rproc 55020000.ipu: -19
>>
>> This change modifies the errata fix to instead use timer 15 and 16 which
>> resolves the timer conflict.
>>
>> It does not appear to introduce any latency regression. Results from
>> cyclictest with original errata fix using dmtimer 3 and 4:
>>
>> # cyclictest --mlockall --smp --priority=80 --interval=200 --distance=0
>> policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.02 0.03 0.05
>>
>> T: 0 ( 1449) P:80 I:200 C: 800368 Min: 0 Act: 32 Avg: 22 Max: 128
>> T: 1 ( 1450) P:80 I:200 C: 800301 Min: 0 Act: 12 Avg: 23 Max: 70
>>
>> The results after the change to dmtimer 15 and 16:
>>
>> # cyclictest --mlockall --smp --priority=80 --interval=200 --distance=0
>> policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.36 0.19 0.07
>>
>> T: 0 ( 1711) P:80 I:200 C: 759599 Min: 0 Act: 6 Avg: 22 Max: 108
>> T: 1 ( 1712) P:80 I:200 C: 759539 Min: 0 Act: 19 Avg: 23 Max: 79
>>
>
> Gentle reminder, I don't see this in linux-next yet, was kinda expecting this
> would be included in the fixes for 5.17.
>
> Just want to make sure that the patch did not get lost in your mbox.
Applied, thanks
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists